By Garner Ted Armstrong


At the end of World War II the United States stood on the pinnacle of world power. With more than eight and a quarter million men under arms; with our vanquished enemies having been forced to accept unconditional surrender, we were at the height of our strength, knowing no peer on earth.


We alone possessed the most fearsome weapon humans had ever devised, the atom bomb.


We had demonstrated its awesome hideousness by obliterating two large Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing about 115,000 Japanese men, women and children, acts justified by proclaiming that it could well cost up to one million American lives if an invasion of the Japanese home islands proved necessary.


World War II saw the indiscriminate bombing of civilian targets — total war against total populations for total stakes.


However, scarcely two years after the Germans and Japanese surrendered, the United States’ military was but a shadow of its former self. The Russians had stolen the secrets of radioactive bombs, and “De-Nazification” in Germany was turned over to the Germans. By the time the North Koreans attacked South Korea in 1950, our military forces had dwindled to a mere 591,000. Those stationed in Korea viewed their presence merely as a training command, working with the South Koreans to form a viable military.


The United States did not desire territory. We did not annex Italian, German or Japanese possessions. We had gone to war to defeat brutal totalitarianism; to bring to justice mass murderers to whom human life meant nothing. Americans learned that our soldiers could fight, and fight with tenacity, courage and bravery when they knew what they were fighting for. Yet, most fought for their buddies; for mom, home, and apple pie. They did not fight for broad geopolitical principles or for lofty philosophical goals. They fought because they had to. Because there was no other choice.


Many of those same soldiers would never understand, either in Korea or Vietnam, how to fight for limited political goals; how to fight wars of attrition and compromise.


As Josef Stalin amply demonstrated, where Soviet arms went, Soviet dominance remained. The Soviet Union had gobbled up all of eastern Europe, had forged alliances with China, had occupied the Kamchatka Peninsula, and was rapidly exercising hegemony from Greece to Africa and the Middle East.


Sir Winston Churchill said it was as if “an iron curtain” had descended over Europe. The phrase was used repeatedly during decades of the “Cold War,” a deadly standoff between the US and the Soviet Union, with each side engaged in a frantic race to build thousands of nuclear weapons, huge, intercontinental ballistic missiles with multiple warheads, long-range strategic bombers, and, yes, a ghastly range of chemical and biological weapons.


For decades, the world nervously walked the tightrope between the war which must never be fought and the peace which could not be achieved. Countless billions were spent by both superpowers to achieve what was called “MAD,” or “Mutually Assured Destruction.” Each power sought to achieve survivability should the other launch a first strike, and ensure that the retaliatory blow would be so devastating that an attacker could not survive. Thus, the policy of massive strength confronting massive strength seemed the only possible recourse in order to avoid a nuclear World War III, which could mean the end of civilization as we know it.


From the time the Soviet Union exploded its first atomic bomb, every decision taken in the situation room in the White House included the nervous question, “But what will the Russians do?” That blinding fear of Communism pervaded every administration from that of Harry Truman to Ronald Reagan.


The late President Harry Truman, who had authorized the air force to drop atomic bombs on Japan, signed off on the development of the hydrogen bomb in January of 1950. It was known the Soviets were also working on this more fearsome weapon — a bomb many times more powerful than the small “dirty bombs” used against Japan.


In June of that year, North Korea invaded South Korea. The North Korean armies quickly overran Seoul, the South Korean capital, and pushed the defending South Korean and US forces down the entire length of the Korean peninsula to a defensive pocket around Pusan, the southernmost city.


Like Pearl Harbor, the NK attack came as a complete surprise. Gone were the bulk of the battle-hardened US troops who had fought in Normandy and South Pacific. While many officers were WWII veterans, large numbers of the enlisted personnel were fresh and untried. Gone, too, was the American spirit of righteous anger and selfless commitment to battle against a hated enemy.


Korea, after all, was a long way from Kansas.


The White House saw the North Korean attack as an attempt by global Communism to swallow up a helpless neighbor, thus threatening Taiwan, the Philippines and all of southeast Asia; one domino about to fall, thus fulfilling the “domino theory” which theorized that if the free world lost in one theater, they lost in all. President Truman was later to write: “I remembered how each time that the democracies failed to act it had encouraged the aggressors to keep going ahead. Communism was acting in Korea just as Hitler, Mussolini, and the Japanese had acted ten, fifteen, and twenty years earlier...If this was allowed to go unchallenged it would mean a third world war...It was also clear to me that the foundations and the principles of the United Nations were at stake unless this unprovoked attack on Korea could be stopped.”


Nevertheless, when Truman told Secretary of Defense Johnson to relate to MacArthur personally that he was to support the South Koreans with elements of air and naval elements under his command, he added, “But only south of the 38th parallel.”


           Thus began a new kind of war — a war neither the military nor the civilian population would ever understand — a war based upon limited objectives, with limited forces committed to battle piecemeal, in order to lean on an enemy and bring him to the conference table.


Never was it to be a war against total populations for total stakes. Never did the United States envision the unconditional surrender of North Korea. Never were US bombers to be allowed to deprive the enemy of his rearward bases or his industrial capacity to wage war.


MacArthur knew that about 85 per cent of the Chinese industrial capacity was located in Manchuria. MacArthur had at his disposal the capability of taking the war to China, should the Communist Chinese intervene. In his mind, that included the use of tactical nuclear weapons. He had no doubt whatsoever that the United States could win decisively in Korea, but that conviction was based upon using all the weapons at his disposal, and using them where they were most effective. He did not know at the outset that he would have to fight in Korea with one hand tied behind his back.


The Korean war was never truly won. Had it been, the United States would not be smarting under the saucy and provocative threats from North Korea, which has scrapped the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and announced it was activating its nuclear program. Oh yes, for “peaceful purposes,” of course. 


General Douglas MacArthur was known for saying, “In war, there is no substitute for victory.” Instead of victory, the US settled for protracted “peace talks” at Panmunjom which dragged on while the fighting continued, with casualties mounting daily. Some of the bloodiest battles in Korea such as “Bloody Ridge,” “Pork Chop Hill,” and “Bunker Hill” were fought while the negotiators droned on. Each side fought to present the negotiators with a fait accompli in terms of occupied territory.


Clearly, the North Koreans and Communist Chinese were bent on using the conflict to their own benefit. They prevaricated, exaggerated, lied, fenced, delayed, and sometimes walked out, using every psychological tool available to gain advantage. Utterly frustrated by their conduct, Admiral C. Turner Joy, leading the UN delegation, came to believe negotiating with the Communists was totally hopeless. So far as he was concerned, the “peace talks” merely provided a sounding board for Communist propaganda, and the manipulation of world public opinion.


In a strong, harshly clear indictment, he told the Communist negotiators, “...any hope that your side would bring good faith to these meetings was forlorn indeed. From the very start, you have cavilled [sic] over procedural details; you have manufactured spurious issues and placed them in controversy for bargaining purposes; you have denied the existence of agreements made between us when you found the fulfillment thereof not to your liking; you have made false charges based on crimes invented for your purposes; and you indulged in abuse and invective when all other tactics proved ineffective. Through a constant succession of delays, fraudulent arguments, and artificial attitudes you have obstructed the attainment of an armistice which easily lay within our grasp had there been equal honesty on both sides of this conference table...It is an enormous misfortune that you are constitutionally incapable of understanding the fair and dignified attitude of the United Nations Command. Apparently you cannot comprehend that strong and proud and free nations can make costly sacrifices for principles because they are strong, can be dignified in the face of abuse and deceit because they are proud, and can speak honestly because they are free and do not fear the truth. Instead, you impute to the United Nations Command the same suspicion, greed and deviousness which are your stock in trade. You search every word for a hidden meaning and every agreement for a hidden trap.”


Powerful words. Blunt, unequivocal indictments of a sly, deceitful, prevaricating enemy.


Those sentiments still apply today, as China, Japan and the US try to “talk” to the North Koreans about their nuclear start-up. Will North Korea negotiate? Are dictators susceptible to reason?


Twice, the United States went to war to halt the spread of Communism in Asia. Twice, we sent our military to fight a war which granted an enemy safe sanctuary; wars fought along an imaginary line drawn by cartographers on a map, which recognized no strategic cities, railways, rivers, mountains, or topographically important military objectives. Twice, we committed troops piecemeal, feeding men into battles for territory they were forced to abandon to the enemy after having won it with their blood. Twice, we strove merely to fight a battle of containment; a battle of attrition which would force an enemy to come to the conference table.


We did not win in Korea. When all the dying was over, all the devastation completed; the landscape strewn with destroyed towns and villages and the wreckage of war, all was just as it was. Hundreds of thousands had died, or been maimed for life. Yet, the political landscape remained the same. A merciless dictator remained in control of the North, and a free and democratic government remained in the South, defended by the US and the UN.


Now, it appears we may have to pay the price for the egregious error of finding a substitute for victory. The same price may have to be paid in Iraq.


America lost in Vietnam. The North Vietnamese did not remain behind any parallel or DMZ once the shooting stopped. Instead, they occupied the South, annexed it, and began their murderous pogroms of eliminating any and all who were suspected of having cooperated with the Americans.


Few realize how deeply the ignominious withdrawal from Vietnam; the frustrating hopelessness of the war hurt American pride. Perhaps the Gulf War managed to salvage some of that lost pride, but once again the military was halted by political considerations. Once again, a substitute was found for victory.


Today, we face the imminent possibility of war with Iraq. Millions of Americans are beginning to question the wisdom of such a war, and even those who are in favor of the Administration’s policy, linking Iraq to global terrorism, anxiously hope President Bush will clearly show the world the proverbial “smoking gun” before hostilities commence.


Some officials now advocate reinstating the draft in the hopes it will cause a backlash of mounting anti-war sentiment just as it did during the war in Vietnam. Their cynicism is not lost on conservatives, who have correctly unveiled their agenda.


And now, at precisely the best geopolitical time for them to do so, the Communist North Koreans threaten the United States with “World War III.”


The rogue nation challenges the Bush Administration, warning them not to impose sanctions, or they will “go to war.” North Korea? At “war” with the “world’s only remaining superpower? The threats are obviously hollow; whistling in the dark by a paranoid dictator who spouts ridiculous drivel calculated to bolster his people’s pride.


While the United States possesses awesome power, we seem bent on proving ourselves a timid giant. We timidly go to the United Nations, Kofi Anan and the blue-helmeted troops from Scandinavia, Europe, Turkey and elsewhere for “approval.” We seek to form “coalitions” which include Muslim countries in the vain hope that hate-filled Islamic populations will see and approve of our peaceful intentions; our presumed just and righteous cause.


We appear deeply concerned, perhaps even fearful, that the North Koreans might make a “dirty bomb.” Since we know they are heavily engaged in exporting missiles and missile technology to middle eastern and sub-continent countries like Iran, Yemen and Pakistan, we appear deeply concerned that once they have produced an arsenal of nuclear weapons along with the missiles to deliver them, they may export such weapons to other rogue nations.


The United States people and their government, for all our vaunted power and gigantic military force, could never say to the North Koreans:


 “We know you intend to build a nuclear bomb. We began building them in the 1940's. Since that time, we have built tens of thousands of them — big ones, medium sized ones, small ones. We have placed nuclear weapons in artillery shells, on the nose cones of thousands of missiles aboard nuclear submarines; on the nose cones of ICBMS and IRBMS, in the bombs carried by our stealth bombers — nuclear weapons with a thousand times the power of the little bomb you are now trying to produce. If we decide to do so, we could utterly destroy your entire country within only minutes. Therefore, you will now halt production of any nuclear weapons, and completely dismantle your nuclear program, or we will turn Pyongyang and other major cities in North Korea into glass. You have exactly one week to comply.”


But the United States is not a totalitarian state. Therefore, we could never utter such words to an upstart, rogue nation.


We have no legions. We cannot send illiterate Carthaginians to subdue enemies afar off. Instead, we must send young men and women from Iowa, North Carolina, Montana and Texas.


Because we are fundamentally a “Christian” nation (recent polls indicate up to 85 per cent of us believe in God), and because we value human life, we cannot imagine using our military power against total populations for total stakes.


We did so in World War II, but that was because of Pearl Harbor and an inflamed and determined national will.


Today, the battered face of even one captured pilot, shown on enemy television, so aggrieves the hearts and minds of millions of Americans that we are willing to go to virtually any limits to appease, placate, and act the pusillanimous and “reasonable” negotiator in order to avoid armed conflict. Americans hate war, as well they should. That is why the mantle of global superpower sits heavily upon our shoulders. Once the peace talks started in Korea, forward commanders were told: “go ahead and fight the war, but don’t get anyone killed.” Spoiled by televised pictures of smart bombs going down elevator shafts, Americans now expect their wars to be “clean” wars, with no casualties on our side, and absolutely no “collateral damage” on the other side.


Wars simply do not work out that way.


Perhaps one of the great enigmas of a free, democratic society based upon Judeo-Christian ethics — placing great value on each human life — is that we are rarely willing to use the tactics of dictators against dictators.


Are we truly the world’s great superpower? Or are we Gulliver in Lilliputia?


Truly, the prophecies of your Bible apply to the United States today as never before.


God says because we as a society have rejected His Ten Commandments and His laws, He will allow terrible curses to descend upon us. Those curses are here, now!


“The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low.


“He shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him: he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail.


“Moreover all these curses shall come upon thee, and shall pursue thee, and overtake thee, till thou be destroyed; because thou hearkenedst not unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which he commanded thee” (Deuteronomy 28:43,45).


Isaiah’s 59th chapter is particularly poignant today: “Behold, the LORD'S hand is not shortened, that it cannot save; neither his ear heavy, that it cannot hear:


 “But your iniquities [lawlessness! The breaking of God’s Ten Commandments] have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear.


“For your hands are defiled with blood [we lead the world in murders], and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered perverseness [Do politicians and government officials ever lie?].


“None calleth for justice [instead, they sometimes let guilty murderers go free, as has just happened in Illinois], nor any pleadeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies; they conceive mischief, and bring forth iniquity...Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed innocent blood: their thoughts are thoughts of iniquity; wasting and destruction are in their paths.


“The way of peace they know not; and there is no judgment in their goings: they have made them crooked paths: whosoever goeth therein shall not know peace.


“Therefore is judgment far from us, neither doth justice overtake us: we wait for light, but behold obscurity; for brightness, but we walk in darkness.


“We grope for the wall like the blind, and we grope as if we had no eyes: we stumble at noon day as in the night; we are in desolate places as dead men.


“We roar all like bears, and mourn sore like doves: we look for judgment, but there is none; for salvation, but it is far off from us.


“For our transgressions are multiplied before thee, and our sins testify against us: for our transgressions are with us; and as for our iniquities, we know them;


“In transgressing and lying against the LORD, and departing away from our God, speaking oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood.


“And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter” (Isaiah 59:1-15).


If we were a nation truly “under God,” as we proclaim on our money, God would FIGHT OUR BATTLES FOR US! He promised, “Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the LORD your God.


“Ye shall keep my Sabbaths, and reverence my sanctuary: I am the LORD [Call for my free booklet “Why Would Anyone Keep Saturday For Sunday?” Dial 903 561-7070 for your free copy].


“If ye walk in my statutes, and keep my commandments, and do them;


“Then I will give you rain in due season, and the land shall yield her increase, and the trees of the field shall yield their fruit.


“And your threshing shall reach unto the vintage, and the vintage shall reach unto the sowing time: and ye shall eat your bread to the full, and dwell in your land safely.


“And I will give peace in the land, and ye shall lie down, and none shall make you afraid: [No fears! No worries; no “terrorists” in our midst!] and I will rid evil beasts out of the land, neither shall the sword go through your land.


“And ye shall chase your enemies, and they shall fall before you by the sword.


“And five of you shall chase an hundred, and an hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight: and your enemies shall fall before you by the sword.


“For I will have respect unto you, and make you fruitful, and multiply you, and establish my covenant with you” (Leviticus 25:1-9).


If we were a nation obedient to God, all these fabulous BLESSINGS would be our lot.


But since we are NOT a nation obedient to God, but a nation which tramples His Sabbath underfoot; which worships many false gods; which has mixed itself among heathen peoples with pagan religions; a nation of crime, violence, divorce, pornography, child abuse, and so-called “political correctness,” we are under a CURSE from God, and not the recipients of His blessings!


For a grasp of our true place in the world, and for a step-by-step sequence of prophetic events yet to be fulfilled, call or write for your free copy of “Europe and America In Prophecy.”


Note: An edited form of this news analysis was published in WorldNetDaily on 14 January and can be accessed here:


back to top home what's new word from main
sermons - audio audio/video page TV program - audio TV program - video
two key prophecies United Europe are we in the end time? good news
best of GTA - TV best of GTA - sermons sound bites TV log
breaking news headlines end time news news sources
booklets 21st Century Watch beliefs heart & soul of gospel
feature page Feast of Tabernacles prophecy page evolution page