News Stories
These are news stories breaking after the publishing of this Word
from.–
NATO...Are Its Final Days Just Ahead
U.S. allies don't
want NATO in Afghanistan
By ROBERT BURNS - AP MILITARY WRITER
POIANA BRASOV, Romania -- France and Germany spoke out Wednesday
against a U.S. proposal to put NATO in charge of the military and
reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan, but U.S. and other officials said
the alliance would go ahead and develop options for merging the
missions.
The issue featured prominently in a meeting of NATO defense ministers at
this ski resort in the Carpathian Mountains. It is expected to resurface
when they reconvene in early February in France.
"There may be some interest in synergy between the two operations, but a
merger of the forces makes no sense," said French Defense Minister
Michele Alliot-Marie. "It would be counterproductive to have the two
missions under a united command."
| France and Germany spoke out
Wednesday against a U.S. proposal to put NATO in charge of the
military and reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan. |
The United States, backed by Britain, wants greater integration between
the 18,000-strong mission it leads to hunt down Taliban and al-Qaida
fighters with the 9,000 NATO peacekeepers currently operating in Kabul,
the capital, and five northern provinces.
The outcome is important because NATO is on course to expand -
numerically and geographically - its involvement in the effort to
stabilize Afghanistan, even as the United States pursues combat
operations. In addition, U.S. forces are working on have reconstruction
projects similar to those of NATO.
The evolution of NATO's role in Afghanistan also is important from a
political standpoint, given the strong tensions that have divided the
United States from some of its longstanding European allies over the
Bush administration's invasion of Iraq.
France and Germany were among the more vocal critics of President Bush's
decision to invade Iraq.
U.S. officials here spoke confidently of overcoming opposition to the
idea of combining the NATO and U.S. military efforts in Afghanistan,
although they said it was unclear what the solution would look like.
"Most countries that spoke today, including our country, said the goal
should be one NATO mission" rather than separate American and NATO
missions, said Nicholas Burns, the U.S. ambassador to NATO.
"There are many ways you could do that," he added. "You could establish
two different task forces, one that does combat and one that does
peacekeeping. But this remains to be worked out."
American officials gave no indication that their motivation for trying
to put NATO in charge in Afghanistan was related to hopes for reducing
U.S. troops levels there.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld did not comment publicly on the
day's talks. He met privately with Russian Defense Minister Sergei
Ivanov on Wednesday evening. Rumsfeld was due to return to Washington on
Thursday, ending a week-long overseas trip that included a visit to Iraq
and a meeting on a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf with
defense ministers from 18 countries - some NATO members, some not - that
support the U.S.-led global war on terrorism.
NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said combining commands in
Afghanistan was an option to be studied, telling a news conference, "The
options the military authorities are going to present to ministers in
February will certainly also include ... the possibility of a unified
command."
German Defense Minister Peter Struck was adamant his government would
oppose any fusion.
"There is a clear 'no' of the German government for a merging of the
mandates," Struck told reporters. "We'll continue focusing on
reconstruction while other nations are engaged in the fight against
international terrorism (in Afghanistan)."
Britain's Defense Secretary Geoffrey Hoon was confident the military
could come up with a plan that enable closer ties while respecting
Berlin's reservations.
"We have to be sensitive to the national considerations," Hoon said. "I
don't see any reason to cross any German red lines."
Struck said he backed the drive to get more NATO troops to expand the
peacekeeping mission, but he doubted Germany's parliament would support
a change of the German military's mandate to allow the alliance to take
on the combat mission.
Germany is one of the largest contributors to the peacekeeping mission,
with 2,500 soldiers.
|