News Stories
These are news stories breaking after the publishing of this Word from.

NATO...Are Its Final Days Just Ahead
 

U.S. allies don't want NATO in Afghanistan
By ROBERT BURNS - AP MILITARY WRITER

POIANA BRASOV, Romania -- France and Germany spoke out Wednesday against a U.S. proposal to put NATO in charge of the military and reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan, but U.S. and other officials said the alliance would go ahead and develop options for merging the missions.

The issue featured prominently in a meeting of NATO defense ministers at this ski resort in the Carpathian Mountains. It is expected to resurface when they reconvene in early February in France.

"There may be some interest in synergy between the two operations, but a merger of the forces makes no sense," said French Defense Minister Michele Alliot-Marie. "It would be counterproductive to have the two missions under a united command."
 

France and Germany spoke out Wednesday against a U.S. proposal to put NATO in charge of the military and reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan.


The United States, backed by Britain, wants greater integration between the 18,000-strong mission it leads to hunt down Taliban and al-Qaida fighters with the 9,000 NATO peacekeepers currently operating in Kabul, the capital, and five northern provinces.

The outcome is important because NATO is on course to expand - numerically and geographically - its involvement in the effort to stabilize Afghanistan, even as the United States pursues combat operations. In addition, U.S. forces are working on have reconstruction projects similar to those of NATO.

The evolution of NATO's role in Afghanistan also is important from a political standpoint, given the strong tensions that have divided the United States from some of its longstanding European allies over the Bush administration's invasion of Iraq.

France and Germany were among the more vocal critics of President Bush's decision to invade Iraq.

U.S. officials here spoke confidently of overcoming opposition to the idea of combining the NATO and U.S. military efforts in Afghanistan, although they said it was unclear what the solution would look like.

"Most countries that spoke today, including our country, said the goal should be one NATO mission" rather than separate American and NATO missions, said Nicholas Burns, the U.S. ambassador to NATO.

"There are many ways you could do that," he added. "You could establish two different task forces, one that does combat and one that does peacekeeping. But this remains to be worked out."

American officials gave no indication that their motivation for trying to put NATO in charge in Afghanistan was related to hopes for reducing U.S. troops levels there.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld did not comment publicly on the day's talks. He met privately with Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov on Wednesday evening. Rumsfeld was due to return to Washington on Thursday, ending a week-long overseas trip that included a visit to Iraq and a meeting on a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf with defense ministers from 18 countries - some NATO members, some not - that support the U.S.-led global war on terrorism.

NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said combining commands in Afghanistan was an option to be studied, telling a news conference, "The options the military authorities are going to present to ministers in February will certainly also include ... the possibility of a unified command."

German Defense Minister Peter Struck was adamant his government would oppose any fusion.

"There is a clear 'no' of the German government for a merging of the mandates," Struck told reporters. "We'll continue focusing on reconstruction while other nations are engaged in the fight against international terrorism (in Afghanistan)."

Britain's Defense Secretary Geoffrey Hoon was confident the military could come up with a plan that enable closer ties while respecting Berlin's reservations.

"We have to be sensitive to the national considerations," Hoon said. "I don't see any reason to cross any German red lines."

Struck said he backed the drive to get more NATO troops to expand the peacekeeping mission, but he doubted Germany's parliament would support a change of the German military's mandate to allow the alliance to take on the combat mission.

Germany is one of the largest contributors to the peacekeeping mission, with 2,500 soldiers.
 

Source back to top back to Headline Index
 home Word from main   back to NATO Word from