Breaking News -- Israel
Israel jittery after US-Saudi Arabia multi-billion dollar military
Israel has voiced concerns about a $110 billion arms deal signed by the US and Saudi Arabia on Saturday, saying it wants answers from President Donald Trump.
The deal will see Riyadh gain some of the world's most sophisticated military equipment, and underlines the warming in relations between Saudi Arabia and US - Israel's key backer.
Yuval Steinitz, a close aide of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, said that Israel must "hear the explanations" of the deal when President Donald Trump arrives in Israel on Monday.
Arms for the region
Trump is in Saudi Arabia for his first overseas visit as president where the multi-billion dollar arms deal - which could stretch out to $380 billion over ten years - was signed.
Secretary of State Rex Hillerson signalled that the weapons were meant to strengthen Saudi Arabia against its regional rival Iran.
Despite this - and Israel's own rivalry with Iran - Steinitz said it is imperative for Israel to have a military advantage over others in the region.
"[Saudi Arabia] is not a country that we have diplomatic relations with... it is still a hostile country and nobody knows what the future holds," Steinitz said, according to AFP.
U.S. official denies Western Wall is Israel's
NE News Now
In the wake of the denial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s request to accompany President Donald Trump to the Western Wall next week, a United States official contended that the wall is not part of Israel.
“The Western Wall is not your territory, but part of the [Palestinian’s] West Bank,” the American official told Israeli officials, according to CBN News.
The contention was not taken well by Israelis, who reportedly shouted back in retaliation to the claim.
"The statement that the Western Wall is in an area in the West Bank was received with shock," an Israel official commented on the exchange, according to Reuters.
Israel’s through and through
As Trump prepares to visit Israel in several days, tension over the rejection of the request reported by Israel’s Channel 2 TV has taken a back seat to the dispute over the ownership of what many call the Wailing Wall – or Kotel – which has been considered one of the most significant sites for Christian and Jewish people, whose holy books speak of the sacred edifice.
“For thousands of years, Jewish people from around the world have come to pray at the wall,” CBN News’ Julie Stahl explained. “It's the closest they have to praying at the Temple Mount – the holiest site in Judaism.”
Israel’s claim to the Western Wall does not just reach back millennia, but more recently, when its military declared victory over the area.
“Israel captured the Old City, along with the rest of east Jerusalem, in the 1967 Mideast war,” Fox News informed. “It considers the entire city to be its eternal capital, and next week is set to celebrate the 50-year anniversary of what it calls the unification of Jerusalem. However, the international community does not recognize Israel's annexation of east Jerusalem, which the Palestinians seek as the capital of a future independent state.”
During the eight years of former President Barack Obama’s pro-Palestinian foreign policy, Israelis had to defend their right to access or build settlements in the disputed West Bank – contesting an anti-Israel stance that many pro-Israel conservatives in America hoped was a thing of the past with the onset of the Trump administration.
“In December, the Obama administration failed to veto a U.N. resolution that said Israel had ‘no validity’ in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) in the eastern sector of Jerusalem,” Stahl recounted. “But Trump's ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, has stood firm against anti-Israel sentiments at the U.N.”
Contrary to the U.S. official’s claim about the Western Wall, David Friedman, the newly appointed U.S. ambassador to Israel, is heading straight to the holy site from the airport in order to pray, asserting that the wall is undisputedly Israel’s.
"The Western Wall is the holiest place in the entire Jewish world," Friedman impressed, according to CBN News.
This week’s spat over the Western Wall has somewhat dampened the optimism that emanated around Trump’s highly anticipated visit to Israel next week.
“Israeli officials appear to be growing increasingly nervous over Trump's visit, when he is expected to make an attempt at re-launching long-stalled peace talks with the Palestinians,” Fox New announced.
However, all of the pro-Israel priorities Trump has tallied up over the past several months are apparently still on the agenda.
“On the campaign trail, Trump voiced solidly pro-Israel positions,” the conservative news source added. “His campaign platform made no mention of an independent Palestinian state. He showed little concern about Israeli settlement construction on occupied lands claimed by the Palestinians, expressed support for recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital and vowed to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.”
And with the U.S. Embassy and the Western Wall apparently on the itinerary, what Trump does in Jerusalem will be eagerly watched by many.
“One focal point of President Trump's visit next week is bound to be Jerusalem,” CBN’s Stahl pointed out. “He's arriving as Israel prepares to celebrate Israel's victory and a reunited Jerusalem following the Six-Day War. Israelis hope that Trump will honor his campaign promise either to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's united capital or announce a move of the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem.”
With the back-and-forth, many pro-Israel Americans and Israelis are apprehensive about what will take place next week.
“Many Israelis expected the Trump visit would bolster Israel's position on Jerusalem and the peace talks,” Stahl continued. “Now, some are anxious about what may happen next week.”
Adding more uncertainty as to what will happen in the upcoming days, Fox News Foreign Correspondent Connor Powell posted a concerning tweet earlier this week.
"Everyone, I've spoken to in DC that has been briefed on the Jerusalem Embassy move says Netanyahu told Trump not to move the embassy at this time," Powell posted on Twitter Monday.
However, Netanyahu’s office immediately rejected the claim as false.
In addition, the prime minister’s office offered more evidence that the social media posting by Fox News was inaccurate.
“The firm denial coming from the prime minister's office was backed by a rare and unusual move,” the Jerusalem Post reported. “The statement released by the office included a transcript from Netanyahu's meeting with Trump in Washington, which took place this February, acting as proof that the report provided by Powell was false. “
Here is what the transcript that outlined a summary of the White House lunch between Netanyahu and Trump stated:
“President Trump was asked about the embassy and explained that it (moving the embassy) will not cause bloodshed in the region, like he has been warned against (President Trump),'” the transcript reads, according to the Post.
This account was corroborated by the Jerusalem daily.
“Netanyahu on Monday called again on Trump to move the embassy to Jerusalem, on the same day that his controversial Israel envoy pick David Friedman arrives in Israel to begin his tenure,” the Jerusalem Post’s Joy Bernard announced.
Israeli Officers: You’re Doing ISIS Wrong
by Bryan Bender
The United States is headed for disaster in Syria, some in Israel are warning.
SSANIA MOUNTAIN, ON THE ISRAEL-SYRIAN BORDER—The Israeli military is not too impressed with President Donald Trump’s escalation against the Islamic State.
That, at least, is the distinct impression I got on a recent trip to Israel, including a visit to the Israeli-occupied side of the Golan Heights that offered a unique vantage point on the hopelessly entangled anarchy that is the Syrian civil war, now in its sixth year.
From atop a network of underground bunkers dating to the 1973 Yom Kippur War, my Israeli Army escort pointed northeast to Al Quneitra, the largely abandoned Syrian city in the distance where forces of President Bashar Assad and Hezbollah are trading mortar fire with rebel fighters who control two nearby villages.
A short drive south, past cherry and apple orchards, an abandoned United Nations outpost just over the fortified border now flies the flag of the Al Nusra Front, an affiliate of Al Qaeda. Farther south, past a remote Israeli drone base, nestled atop a craggy slope across the valley below is a training base for the Islamic State, which is making new inroads far from its capital of Raqqa, more than 300 miles across the desert.
“If going north or west is not an option,” explained one Israel Defense Force official, pointing toward the small ISIS training camp situated through a thatch of trees where southern Syria juts between Israel and Jordan, “they are going to go somewhere else.”
“Some are already coming here. And Jordan is very concerned about the Islamic State.”
My trip came several weeks before Trump was due to arrive in Israel on a maiden foreign trip that is focused heavily on the Islamic State, which he has vowed to “demolish and destroy.” But the assessment he receives from a close U.S. ally that has confronted Islamic militants for generations—and recently uncovered critical intelligence about an ISIS plot to use laptops to blow up airplanes—may not be what he wants to hear.
In the view of the Israeli military and intelligence units I visited over several days in late April, the U.S. strategy in Iraq and Syria may be making the situation only worse. We’re radicalizing the local population and spreading the hardest-core militants to sow havoc in neighboring Lebanon—which the officers I spoke with fear may already be on the verge on collapse—and Jordan. Still others are escaping the onslaught to Europe and possibly America.
“I am not sure it will be easy to defeat ISIS, as you are claiming to do,” Army Brig. Gen. Ram Yavne, the head of the IDF’s Strategic Division, told me in Tel Aviv, expressing a level of puzzlement shared by a number of other top commanders about the U.S. military obsession with a group that they do not consider a major strategic threat.
Several officials pointed out that even the largest estimates of the number of ISIS’s fiercest adherents are on par with Hamas, the Palestinian militant group that controls the Gaza Strip.
But Trump sees it differently. He has authorized his military commanders to step up U.S. military involvement in both Iraq and Syria, including granting the Pentagon more authority to go after ISIS targets and to insert hundreds of additional American forces into Syria. As recently as Friday, Secretary of Defense James Mattis vowed to “destroy” ISIS, first by taking Raqqa and then supporting the campaign by local Arab and Kurdish forces to clear other Syrian cities along the Euphrates River, where the group has a significant presence. “We’re there to drive ISIS to its knees,” he told reporters, saying the more aggressive U.S. strategy seeks the group’s “annihilation.”
But some Israeli commanders, who agreed to share their assessments of the Syria conflict on the condition they not be identified, went as far as saying that the American actions in Syria and Iraq, where U.S.-backed Iraqi forces recently liberated the city of Mosul, could be turning ISIS and its affiliates elsewhere in the region into an even bigger threat to the West.
“The worst is yet to come,” one intelligence official said.
Several stressed that unlike Al Qaeda, another Sunni terrorist group that attacked the United States on 9/11, the Islamic State predicated itself not on attacking the West but revolutionizing Islam in its most rigid, violent form.
“What ISIS has been saying since the beginning—the concept of the caliphate—was ‘we need to put our house in order first and then we have time to fight’ the outside powers,” an intelligence officer at the IDF’s Northern Command base, outside the city of Safed, told me as he pored over a map of the Syrian frontier. He believes the United States has failed to understand the competing interests and constantly shifting alliances among what the IDF estimates are between 400 and 500 different groups fighting in the Syrian civil war—including underestimating the level of local support ISIS actually has.
“Take Mosul, for example. Mosul is a million-citizen city and the largest estimate said [there were] 8,000 militants. You can’t control a million-people city with 8,000 people if you don’t have some support within the population.”
In eastern Syria, where ISIS is believed to be strongest, “the population is relatively favorable to the Islamic cause—the tribes and so forth,” he added. “When you bring a Western logic into an eastern Arab mentality it doesn’t usually work out. A Western mind doesn’t really understand the nuances of Arab tribal society anywhere in the Middle East.”
During the campaign, Trump promised to “bomb the shit out of ISIS.” But the American-led military campaign against the group—like the brutal attacks committed by Assad’s forces and its Russian military allies—may simply be radicalizing a new generation of terrorists bent on attacking Western countries.
“The bombing sometimes is causing more damage than it helps,” the military intelligence officer said. “You are also perceived as one of those guys blowing things up.”
The U.S. may live to regret it.
“ISIS is much like cancer,” the intelligence officer at the IDF's Northern Command said. “It is easy to cut the tumors off. But how do you prevent the small cancer cells from expanding? I think the caliphate is already thinking, ‘OK, what are we going to do next?’ What was ISIS doing the minute the Americans and Iraqis went into Mosul? It started exploding everything up in Iraq—about 1,000 suicide attacks in a number of months. Raqqa is probably going to fall. The same thing will happen. All the cancerous cells throughout Syria ... are going to do the same and start blowing things up.”
The United States has mishandled the situation in other ways, in the view of the Israelis I spoke with. For example, U.S. efforts to train rebel fighters inside Syria to fight ISIS are widely seen as counterproductive. “The CIA [training] program goes against Assad and the Pentagon program only goes for rebels against ISIS,” the intelligence officer complained. “So what is the U.S. stance is not really clear here.”
Israeli analysts laid out several possible scenarios ahead for the Syrian civil war, including that Assad regains control of his country (not likely) and the regime grants some rebels group autonomy and economic incentives in return for coexistence (already well underway).
What they agree on is that Assad is now unquestionably winning. And he owes Hezbollah, the radical Shia Muslim proxy of Iran, “big time” for it.
The so-called Army of God, which has gone to war with Israel twice and constitutes a state within a state in neighboring Lebanon, has lost an estimated 1,700 fighters bleeding for the Syrian dictator and as payback is now seeking to expand its new base of operations in Syria—which also means a new sphere of influence for the mullahs in Tehran.
“If Assad wins,” one IDF official in the Golan Heights told me, “we will have Hezbollah on two borders not one.”
Yavne, the brigadier general, similarly described the Iranian influence as significantly more worrisome than ISIS or other Sunni Muslim terror groups:
“If I can be frank, the radical axis headed by Iran is more risky than the global jihad one," said Yavne. “It is much more knowledgeable, stronger, with a bigger arsenal.”
As far as these Israeli officers are concerned, the ideal strategy is to sit back and let both types of groups duke it out—and work to contain the conflict rather than trying to end it with military force. As the IDF intelligence officer put it, “the battle for deterrence is easier than the battle for influence.”
But does that mean the United States and its allies should simply allow ISIS to retain its so-called caliphate in parts of eastern Syria and eastern Iraq?
“Why not?” the officer shot back. “When they asked the late [Israeli] Prime Minister Menachem Begin in the Iraq-Iran War in the 80s, who does Israel stand for, Iraq or Iran, he said, ‘I wish luck to both parties. They can go at it, killing each other.’ The same thing is here. You have ISIS killing Al Qaeda by the thousands, Al Qaeda killing ISIS by the thousands. And they are both killing Hezbollah and Assad.”
I asked an IDF official peering out into the Syrian frontier a similar question—about the consequences of America’s war against ISIS in the region.
“There is no lack of Islamic militant groups here,” he said, clutching a machine gun in one hand and a pineapple popsicle in another. “You just haven’t heard of them yet.”
|(Disclaimer) What to Look For in World Events: Audio & Text Video|